I first came to the Pando Aspen Clone with a question: what is the relationship between the tree and its landscape? As a sculptor and naturalist, I’ve spent my year as Artist in Residence with Friends of Pando exploring the ways the tree inhabits the underground landscape it calls home, and what lessons it might offer us humans in cultivating a relationship with our planet.
When I first started my residency with Friends of Pando in June 2023, I’d already been thinking about Pando for over a year. From my home in New York City, I’d been researching images and maps of the Pando tree and of Aspen trees in general, and using what I found to create sculptures inspired by Aspen’s growth patterns aboveground. Living in a relatively flat, urban place, I was fascinated by the sculptural quality of mountains, and the differences I saw in the ways that plants occupied these landscapes as compared with the ways in which we humans take up space. My early sculptures abstracted the landscapes I saw in maps and satellite imagery of the Pando Clone, using the peaks and craters of Utah’s land formations as canvasses for clusters of spiked and gold-lustered surface decorations representing trees.
In August 2023, I spent just under a week camping in the Pando clone and exploring the tree and its context. Hiking through dense underbrush and jagged, pumice-filled bedding, my experience of the tree couldn’t have felt more different from my armchair explorations the year before. Out in the field, I needed to be alert to everything, yet everything seemed to be competing for my attention. Between rain showers, stinging wasps, unstable footing, and a constant, dull awareness of my intrusion into Grizzly territory, the deep understanding I thought I’d cultivated of Pando’s topography, landscape, and boundaries gave way to the realization – over and over – that I was lost. Without fencing, would I know the boundaries between this tree and the next clone over? And with such density in plant life and rock formations underfoot, what chance was there of catching a glimpse of the root system that tied it all together?
"Climbing up the steep slopes of Pando’s western range, I struggled to reconcile the wilderness before me with the simplicity of the maps I’d studied before my trip. In retrospect, I was experiencing the feeling described so well in Rebecca Solnit’s Field Guide to Getting Lost: ‘to be lost is to be fully present, and to be fully present is to be capable of being in uncertainty and mystery.’”
~Emily Loughlin
Uncertainty and mystery – both integral qualities of the wilderness Pando occupies – don’t show up on maps. In fact, maps typically exist for the very purpose of reducing uncertainty – eliminating mystery. My preconceptions of this place, I realized, had taken on the abstract rationalism of maps and photographs. By drastically reducing complexity and drawing sometimes arbitrary boundaries, they’d created a simplified representation of the tree that had little to no direct connection to the tree itself.
As pioneering land art critic and writer Lucy Lippard notes in her 2014 book Undermining, “Lines across the map, across the land, inform a way of seeing that flattens and blurs the places they run through.” The more I leaned into the uncertainty of Pando’s environment, the more this abstracting quality of its maps seemed related to the process I knew as artmaking. If the maps that existed for this place had been drawn by geographers, land managers, geologists, ecologists – what new perspective could I draw from as an artist in mapping the Pando Clone? And how might these new maps retain the uncertainty and mystery that so permeated the landscape, rather than seeking to eliminate it?
As I explored Pando and its surrounding environment, I searched for elements of uncertainty and mystery that resonated with me and my experience as an artist. With a background in architecture, urban planning and sculptural ceramics, I found myself drawn to art forms that blended architecture’s clean rationalism with the tactile, earthy quality of clay and its connection to geology and geologic time. I loved how words like “tectonic” and “structure” described both the worldbuilding powers of geology and human-made buildings or sculptures – as if the creativity we possessed as humans bore relation to geologic forces deep in the earth’s core. Identifying with the tree, I wondered what structures Pando might have created for itself, and how those built forms related to the forms already existing underground – the architecture of its geology.
I’d seen in maps that nearly all of Pando’s soil was basalt. But stepping on, climbing over, tripping across all of these basalt rocks – rocks which so closely resembled the “lava” glazes I’d used in my earlier sculptures – I developed a fascination with them. Driving around the region surrounding Pando, I saw more of these rocks, even pulling over to the side of a highway to climb on a seemingly infinite pile of them in the Markagunt Plateau in nearby Dixie National Forest. Just like my glazes, these rocks had heated and cooled rapidly – bubbling and pitting as they came into contact with the air. That “bubble geometry” I observed in the local rocks was certainly unique – might it somehow be contributing to Pando’s extraordinary longevity and extent? It also seemed to reflect what I was seeing in the tree when I looked at the tree’s leaves and stem tissue through my pocket microscope. Could it be that the tree had found its geological soulmate – an “ergonomic” environment whose geometry perfectly matched its own?
As an artist, my relationship with science is limited. But through my residency, I had access to scientists and researchers who’ve helped me better understand the content and context of Pando’s underground world. What had been a black box was now a fluid, volcanic landscape that moved and changed in time scales not wholly dissimilar from the 10,000+ year lifespan of Pando itself. Speaking to the geologist Grant Willis, I learned that the tree was enmeshed in a constantly growing series of fault lines above a hot volcanic core, slowly but constantly ejecting these basalt boulders into the earth above. Every year this constant spreading and spewing added hundreds of acres of land to this part of southern Utah and Arizona. I wondered, if Pando’s name came from the Latin word “I spread,” couldn’t the same be said for the slowly spreading earth underfoot?
Coming back home to New York, I set about exploring the mystery of Pando’s relationship with its underground world through mapmaking. The map drawings that I’d started early in my residency and throughout my trip became map sculptures, and I played with scale and abstraction to try and simulate the feeling of enormity and confusion that came from being present within such a large organism.
After months of drawing, my relationship to clay became more intentional and conceptually tied with geology. The ceramic process of heating and cooling closely resembled the igneous rock I hoped to represent; similarly, the lifespan of low-fired clay – which remained porous like pumicey basalt – also resembled the lifespan of Pando’s bedrock. Both would crumble and erode within geologically similar timescales. But if my goal was to create a sculptural “map” that depicted the “bio-mineral” relationship between Pando and its underground world, I needed a very different material to stand in for the tree itself.
While I researched and experimented with other materials, I started building Pando’s topographic environment in clay. Pulling the qualities I found interesting in basalt, I experimented with reduced firing temperatures and unglazed, “honeycombed” surfaces to represent the land as a vessel. Using clay to extrude these flat representations of the landscape back up into three dimensional space required some additional structural support, and as I developed a visual style for this, I recognized the ways in which the crossbars that I created connecting a topography’s isoclines represented the microscopic segments in cellulose.
As I built these larger topographies, I used my own body for scale, with sculptures reaching heights between 5 and 6 ft. Working on such a scale with clay was a slow process, with long periods spent planning and drawing in preparation. These preparatory drawings and studies provided a blank slate for experimentation, often inspiring new directions even after I’d started progress on the larger works they meant to inform. When I felt confident in an idea for a larger work, I’d draw or print new versions of the maps I’d drawn at final scale, using these paper maps as templates for building segments of the sculptures that would fit into my kiln – segments that often, paradoxically, resembled the “lines across a map” or geographic quadrants Lucy Lippard described as flattening.
While my work on topographies progressed, I explored with textile as a metaphor. I played with weaving into and through ceramic forms, and experimented with plant-based fibers like banana fiber, cotton and hemp, as well as “SeaCell” and Tencel – silky yarns made from kelp and bamboo – dying the fibers myself with henna and kutch. I appreciated the material connection between these cellulose-based fibers and the tree, and as I worked I felt the slow process of weaving into ceramic to be a meditation on the tree’s own experience of rooting – a much needed respite from the physical exhaustion and mess of forming so many pounds of clay.
Working through my weaving experiments, I was pulled into two different directions – one a transparent “overlay” using embroidery and beading to map the Pando tree’s summer foliage density, and the other a 10 ft square tapestry of tiles woven together with cotton thread.
With the looming deadline of an exhibition at Keepsake Gallery in Brooklyn NY in early 2024, I prioritized working on the overlay, which would accompany a 3 ft x 5 ft topographic wall panel to create an immersive installation called Trembling Giant. For reference, I used aerial imagery of the Pando tree from Google Maps, which I edited with Photoshop to reduce into something more closely resembling a “point density map” before sending it to be printed at scale. Racing towards my exhibition opening, I hung a 10 ft organza substrate from the ceiling in my Brooklyn apartment and worked through the night for weeks, hand-sewing gold-foil lined beads with silk thread to trace the printed image behind.
When installed, the subtle glimmer of glass beads and gold foil in sunlight captured some of Pando’s enigmatic shimmering as wind caught its silvery leaves, and the overlay’s placement in a window meant its appearance changed dramatically throughout the day, casting shadows onto the topography behind.
Despite being a first attempt at introducing this new material and technique into my practice, I fell in love with both the process and outcome of the embroidered map. Like ceramic, textiles are deeply tactile, inviting touch and interaction from the viewer in ways that formal sculpture typically does not. I considered the way that both mediums have historically been viewed as separate from art – downgraded to “craft,” or more tellingly, to “women’s work.” Looking again to Lucy Lippard and Undermining, I leaned into this embrace of historically feminine materials and processes. Lippard writes, “Women identify with ‘nature,’ not because of ‘essentialism,’ but because we share with nature the dominant culture’s attempts at control.” My use of material – subject to the slumping and cracking of kiln temperatures or the flutter of a breeze – makes peace with the uncertainty and lack of control we expect when fully present in nature.
For the same exhibition, titled Biomineral Topographies, I also included three additional sculptures – Inoculated Landscapes – that wove together ceramic topographies with organic components. Unlike the Trembling Giant installation, my intent with these sculptures was to use the language of maps to tell a more general story about ways that plants like Pando might interact with the tectonics of their geology. Also starting with ceramic topographies, these sculptures weren’t based on any real-life maps – instead taking a note from the first topographic map ever drawn – Marcellin Du Carla’s Hypothetical Map from 1782.
Rather than weave these sculptures with fiber, I wanted to create a material relationship that could be seen growing and changing in real time – as if we were capable of experiencing Pando’s bio-mineral relationship from day-to-day rather than decade-to-decade or century-to-century. To do this, I built my topographies in such a way that they could be planted with living mycelium and coaxed, over the course of the six-week exhibition, into growing live, edible oyster mushrooms.
Building topographies for growth created complexities I hadn’t yet encountered in my process as a sculptor. In order for the mushrooms’ mycelial root system to spread freely across the landscape, the topography that I built needed to be completely hollow, rather than built from tall channels of clay like my other sculptures. These works were incredibly delicate, and needed to be built quickly, over intense bursts of 12 or 14 hours at a time before a long, slow drying process. Working in a parallel artist residency with the Brooklyn ceramic studio Artshack, which sponsored the Keepsake Gallery exhibition, I used their facilities and tools to build, working with other ceramicists in the studio to learn novel techniques for fixing cracks and managing the work’s humidity.
Once built and fired, I layered these sculptures on top of acrylic bases, first sterilizing and later “planting” them with mycelium before sealing them up and waiting for the telltale signs of “inoculation.”
In essence, the process for starting new mushroom growth is much like the process for planting garden perennials – once the roots have matured (or in mushroom terms – “mycelium” has “inoculated” its container), the “plants” or mushrooms above the surface will continuously sprout, bloom, and die in cycles. Through this metaphor of mushroom inoculation, I hoped to show how Pando, too has spread dramatically, fully saturating or “inoculating” its 106-acre landscape and establishing such dominance that it does not need to struggle to survive and continuously send up new shoots across its vast environment.
“Inoculation” is a funny term. In daily parlance, we associate inoculation with vaccination – or an antibody’s ability to develop throughout our bodies enough that it naturally outcompetes a particular virus. Understanding the term through mushroom cultivation, the meaning is similar but perhaps more relatable, both to ourselves and to other organisms like Pando. When growing mushrooms at home or in a lab, you need two key ingredients: a nutrient-rich substrate like wood chips or compost, and “spawn” – any material that has healthy mycelium (mushroom roots) already growing on it. Within a few weeks of mixing the spawn and the substrate, the fungus’s mycelium will “inoculate” its container, eventually becoming so dominant that it guarantees its own survival against predators and starts the process of making mushrooms aboveground.
Nurturing the mycelium in my sculptures, I began thinking more deeply about how this “inoculation” process might be a better word for Pando’s growth across its landscape than the more fraught term “colonization.” Through inoculation, the organism establishing itself in a particular landscape does so in a way that is symbiotic rather than domineering. If vaccines were to deploy antibodies that colonized our bodies, rather than inoculating them, they would wreak havoc – probably killing us. Mushrooms, too, rely on the health of other organisms in their underground ecosystem – so much so that they often pass water and nutrients along to plant species as much as they benefit from munching on the decayed matter present in the soil.
This seemingly slight difference in terminology reminded me of the classic in environmental non-fiction, Aldo Leopold’s Sand County Almanac, where he too sought to understand a place in all its complexities over time, and use that web of complexity as a model – or map – for human action. In his forward, Leopold wrote that “we abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us” rather than “a community to which we belong.” I wondered what lessons we might learn from exceptionally resilient inoculators like Pando on living in community with our environment, and how understanding the difference between colonization and inoculation might make us better stewards of this tree – and our environments in general – for thousands more years to come.
While my residency comes to an official end in June 2024, my work will continue to map new ways of living in resonance with the natural world in all its uncertainty. As I worked towards this year’s exhibition deadline and the workshops and events that surrounded it, I put other, larger projects on hold – projects that I’m excited to shift focus towards as I continue to explore the mysteries of Pando and other enigmatic natural places.
Working with Friends of Pando over the past year has opened my mind to new modes of inquiry and built my confidence in bridging that sometimes vast chasm between arts and sciences. The culture of stewardship and inquiry that they’ve fostered around the tree makes it possible for artists like me to not just see across that divide, but to cross it. Thank you to Lance and everyone at Friends of Pando for your mentorship, trust, and many many hours of time over the past year. That’s a gift that, like Pando, keeps on spreading.
Emily Loughlin’s ceramic and mixed-media sculptures reflect a research-based practice examining biological colonization, growth and symbiosis over time. By referencing organisms that outlast all their neighbors, such as California’s many thousand-year-old Bristlecone Pine trees and ever-regenerating clonal species – such as Utah’s Pando Aspen Clone – her works emerge from the global trend towards longer-term, generational thinking that necessarily accompanies any discourse on climate change and the Anthropocene. Built from stoneware, porcelain, and locally dug clay, these works are designed to inhabit the geologic lifespans of the organisms she studies, and imagine an impossibly far-future viewer.
In addition to a meditation on time and timelessness, her focus on organisms that are both colonies and colonizers of their respective environments aims to visualize the generative forces present in nature, and contextualize humanity’s near-complete colonization of our own environment. In particular, Emily’s ongoing research of the 100-acre Pando Aspen clone has resulted in a series of abstract studies depicting growth patterns of branches, spiking up from an underground root system. Through her residency with Friends of Pando, she is working to expand upon this series to create larger-scale tiled works that will map the site’s topography and visualize the tree’s change over time.
Since receiving her B.A. in Sculpture from Sarah Lawrence College in 2015, Emily’s practice has fluctuated between dedicated studio time and intensive ecological research. Her works are available through Armature projects in New York and through Jessie Edwards Gallery in Rhode Island, and have been included in exhibitions in New York, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Louisiana, and online.
Friends of Pando is dedicated and working to educate the public, support research and preservation efforts and inspire stewardship of Pando, the world’s largest tree.
Friends of Pando is a proud partner of Pando’s public land stewards, Fishlake National Forest of the U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture. Learn more about our partnership.
Friends of Pando and its partners are equal opportunity employers.
Just $14 a month supports work to ensure Pando can be enjoyed for generations to come. Make a one-time or, recurring tax deductible donation today.
Friends of Pando
PO Box 12
Richfield, UT, 84701
Phone: 435-633-1893
IRS EIN: 87-3958681